JackViolet Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 Did any of those who aren't getting it ever try to contact him on there before? It's possible to block users from your profile... --Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hotdlp Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 Did any of those who aren't getting it ever try to contact him on there before? It's possible to block users from your profile... --Jack he must have faves then cos lauren and natalie have contacted him and he hasn't blocked themm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackViolet Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 Then I don't know. That is his real account though, I think. Which, however, would be all the more reason not to bother him too much there... --Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoveLoveMIKA Posted July 20, 2007 Author Share Posted July 20, 2007 Did any of those who aren't getting it ever try to contact him on there before? It's possible to block users from your profile... --Jack Good point. I am sure I never tried to contact him before at "Mica Penniman," in fact, I don't believe I've ever seen that profile. So, maybe the reason why some people can't see it is it's just a bug in the system? I note: About the US versus London/England/Britain/UK theory, someone saw the profile "Mica Penniman" in New York, I live in Miami, Florida and I haven't seen it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yoppappop Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 I never tried and he doesn't appear for me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christine Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 I think Facebook is buggy. I searched a couple of weeks ago and saw some obviously fake Mica Penniman who was friends with a bunch of wannabe hookers all over the world. Now I'm getting the one in the screencap that Jack says is legit. But yeah, people, do not contact him on Facebook. It's obviously private since none of the fans we know of have access. You're just making extra work for him while he's trying to keep in touch with his mates. If you've got something to say to him, send him a message on his public MySpace account. He's made many references to reading stuff there even if he doesn't have time to respond. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaMango Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 My 2 cents: We are Mika Fan Club, not Mica Fan Club. We come here to celebrate Mika, the musician. We should leave Mica, the man, alone. That's all I have to say about that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chartreuse Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 I find this whole thing a little fluke-y. I doubt Mika would just pluck out certain fans to befriend and block others. Or have such ambiguous interactions with any of them over Facebook, especially for over an hour (he's one busy ass man). it doesn't seem very difficult to be an imposter on Facebook. All you need is a picture and a name. but by the very slim chance that it is Mika, this leaves a bit of a bad taste in my mouth. favoring/acknowledging certain fans and ignoring others is pretty unprofessional, especially over the Internet... there's just something dislikable about this whole thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yoppappop Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 Anyway, he wouldn't flirt with a fan... We all know for sure now that he's into fruits Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christine Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 Anyway, he wouldn't flirt with a fan... We all know for sure now that he's into fruits I don't know. I think he could be stalking fans on the internet. I've heard he is into apples, but maybe not the fruit variety. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yoppappop Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 I don't know. I think he could be stalking fans on the internet. I've heard he is into apples, but maybe not the fruit variety. He he he... Apples are apples We're not restrictive Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chartreuse Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 whew! Lawd........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CazGirl Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 ok so who's getting this and who isn't? cos its weird that not everyone's getting the same thing *very confused* I'm not getting the first one! thanks for the screen print! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CazGirl Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 I don't know. I think he could be stalking fans on the internet. I've heard he is into apples, but maybe not the fruit variety. ROFL that is effing hilarious :roftl: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hotdlp Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 I'm not getting the first one! thanks for the screen print! no problem .. i'm still confused as to why its happening *sigh* i just give up *wipes forehead* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoveLoveMIKA Posted July 20, 2007 Author Share Posted July 20, 2007 I don't know. I think he could be stalking fans on the internet. I've heard he is into apples, but maybe not the fruit variety. Hilarious! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mika_Special Posted July 20, 2007 Share Posted July 20, 2007 That cracked me up so much !! The pic was soo funny !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackiexx Posted July 21, 2007 Share Posted July 21, 2007 I don't know. I think he could be stalking fans on the internet. I've heard he is into apples, but maybe not the fruit variety. hey, my laughter could be very loud and it's 1:15am you should find some photo with better knees really I ran over some profile named Mica Penniman, i couldn't view friends bit from that profile. then I tried to add him but there's no reply. maybe i should try it with some message " Oi Mika, I'm not a massive fan cos im not fantasizing, I just like you, coffee? " yep, something like that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoveLoveMIKA Posted July 21, 2007 Author Share Posted July 21, 2007 you should find some photo with better knees really Aw, I think his knees are rather nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ohwowitsnicka Posted July 21, 2007 Share Posted July 21, 2007 He wont add me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
natalie923 Posted July 21, 2007 Share Posted July 21, 2007 that picture is hilarious and also slightly disturbing.... ohhhh the creepy imagery!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JackViolet Posted July 21, 2007 Share Posted July 21, 2007 but by the very slim chance that it is Mika, this leaves a bit of a bad taste in my mouth. favoring/acknowledging certain fans and ignoring others is pretty unprofessional, especially over the Internet... there's just something dislikable about this whole thing. I think it's his real account because I was pointed towards it ages ago, and he had a different photo up then that was definitely not a fansite photo, and looked self-taken. (Kinda a Myspace angle shot, hehe. ) And anyway, why wouldn't he have one, if his sisters do? But I don't think there's any favoring/ignoring going as such, and especially nothing we can possibly call "unprofessional," because this is his private account, having to do with Mica not Mika, and thus not having to do with his job, and thus not having to do with being professional. Maybe he was bored one day and decided on a whim to chat with whoever tried to add him, just 'cause. I mean, on my MySpace, I generally try to only add people I know, but once or twice I accepted add requests from random users because they seemed interesting and I felt like it, even if I denied add requests from other people the next day. Why should it be different here? Plus it's not like he added any fans. And anyway, as a private person, he is allowed to add or ignore whoever he likes onto his private profile. It's like a bunch of fans showed up at his doorstep and asked to be invited for tea, and one day he thought "well this is funny," and came out and chatted with them, and on another day he thought, "no really, I just want to drink my tea in peace" and never answered the door, and people started to complain that he was being unfair and unprofessional. --Jack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kavi Posted July 21, 2007 Share Posted July 21, 2007 I think it's his real account because I was pointed towards it ages ago, and he had a different photo up then that was definitely not a fansite photo, and looked self-taken. (Kinda a Myspace angle shot, hehe. ) And anyway, why wouldn't he have one, if his sisters do? But I don't think there's any favoring/ignoring going as se, and especially nothing we can possibly call "unprofessional," because this is his private account, having to do with Mica not Mika, and thus not having to do with his job, and thus not having to do with being professional. Maybe he was bored one day and decided on a whim to chat with whoever tried to add him, just 'cause. I mean, on my MySpace, I generally try to only add people I know, but once or twice I accepted add requests from random users because they seemed interesting and I felt like it, even if I denied add requests from other people the next day. Why should it be different here? Plus it's not like he added any fans. And anyway, as a private person, he is allowed to add or ignore whoever he likes onto his private profile. It's like a bunch of fans showed up at his doorstep and asked to be invited for tea, and one day he thought "well this is funny," and came out and chatted with them, and on another day he thought, "no really, I just want to drink my tea in peace" and never answered the door, and people started to complain that he was being unfair and unprofessional. --Jack totally agree!!! i'm now psyched "mika" added me most likely it's not him, but who knows (i doubt) but atleast i have a mika friend u know although it's most likely NOT him, it still makes me happy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chartreuse Posted July 21, 2007 Share Posted July 21, 2007 I think it's his real account because I was pointed towards it ages ago, and he had a different photo up then that was definitely not a fansite photo, and looked self-taken. (Kinda a Myspace angle shot, hehe. ) And anyway, why wouldn't he have one, if his sisters do? But I don't think there's any favoring/ignoring going as se, and especially nothing we can possibly call "unprofessional," because this is his private account, having to do with Mica not Mika, and thus not having to do with his job, and thus not having to do with being professional. Maybe he was bored one day and decided on a whim to chat with whoever tried to add him, just 'cause. I mean, on my MySpace, I generally try to only add people I know, but once or twice I accepted add requests from random users because they seemed interesting and I felt like it, even if I denied add requests from other people the next day. Why should it be different here? Plus it's not like he added any fans. And anyway, as a private person, he is allowed to add or ignore whoever he likes onto his private profile. It's like a bunch of fans showed up at his doorstep and asked to be invited for tea, and one day he thought "well this is funny," and came out and chatted with them, and on another day he thought, "no really, I just want to drink my tea in peace" and never answered the door, and people started to complain that he was being unfair and unprofessional. --Jack true. I just feel that if you're rejecting certain fans you're not personally acquainted with, yet adding others, and then calling it your "private" account.... just doesn't really balance out to me. he didn't decide to chat with whomever added him; he took the initiative to add them. that's what i was talking about. i see your logic if he had logged on, saw the first comment on his page from some fan out there, and replied. but if you're interacting with someone on an artist-to-fan basis, i don't feel it's right to add certain people and acknowledge them but ignore/block your other fans. the whole "mica/mika" thing doesn't make sense. I don't think just because the spelling is "mica" means that it's somehow a private account as opposed to "mika" unless he's specified only people close to him call him by that. either way, I don't have facebook, ain't gettin' one, and wouldn't initiatively add him anyway. cause apparently it is supposed to be at least quasi-private. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lollipop_monkey Posted July 21, 2007 Share Posted July 21, 2007 And anyway, why wouldn't he have one, if his sisters do? Might I add that if you look at Paloma's profile, there's no Mika or Mica of any sort on her friends list. Most people would theoretically friend their own siblings, no? I mean, that's not CSI-style proof, but just a thought... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now